Search for: "John Doe, 4" Results 4981 - 5000 of 8,767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2013, 6:00 am by David Kris
[4]  Where do we want or need broad governmental power, and the famous “speed and agility” that apparently motivated the Terrorist Surveillance Program? [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
However, Secure Energy did not notify the insurer of the claim until May 4, 2011. [read post]
18 May 2013, 10:55 pm by Dan Flynn
U.S. farm-raised catfish does have a few advantages. [read post]
15 May 2013, 2:01 pm by David Friedman
When asked in exactly what sense your philosophy implies a special concern for the poor, you change the subject.4. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:33 pm by admin
  The Bureau is also further attempting to challenge the Tribunal’s finding that a practice of anti-competitive acts must be directed at a competitor, arguing that the Tribunal erred in its interpretive findings in this regard that relied, among other things, on subsection 79(4) of the Act and the Bureau’s Abuse of Dominance Guidelines. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:59 am by Ronald Collins
  Andy Siegel clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens, Joe Thai clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens and Justice Byron White, and I clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
8 May 2013, 2:04 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Living the good life at Montecello – the Tea Room Nor does Meacham spend time on Jefferson’s detailed calculations about how much money he could make from the “propagation” of black slaves (a 4 percent profit every year, he noted). [read post]
5 May 2013, 6:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Seven American soldiers killed on May 4. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:52 am by Ryan Emenaker
Figure 4 The period from 1990-1999 had the most federal laws struck down in a single decade with twenty-three (see figure 4). [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:22 am by John L. Welch
So the chances of a refusal being affirmed are probably higher than 2 to 1.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
 John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]