Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 13,524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2017, 9:24 am
My amicus brief in the pending California Supreme Court Hassell v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
In Ruiz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
The decision of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights handed down last week in Bărbulescu v Romania ([2017] ECHR 754) is a surprising one that acts as a warning to employers. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
I thought that the victim was initially a certain age, then later I thought that I must have gotten it wrong, only to find out (upon further review) that I was right all along.Regardless, it's not the fact pattern that might instantly spring to mind when you read the first line:"A jury convicted Andres Lujano of sodomy of an intoxicated person (Pen. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
” Jenkins v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
"Okay.But then the police cross the line, in my view. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 6:36 am
The Legal Test The current legal test is set out in the Misetich v Value Villages Stores case. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 6:36 am
The Legal Test The current legal test is set out in the Misetich v Value Villages Stores case. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:15 pm
That's a fine line, and smart people could (and would) argue about whether that line was crossed here.But the line was at least approached. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
” In Davis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:03 am
Here Levinson and Graber draw direct comparisons between the Jim Crow regime that gave rise to Brown v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
“People really have adapted to it and laboratories have found their own solutions. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:27 pm
I know many a law book that sits unused simply because the inability to find understandable text quickly means people fall out of the habit of using it, coz it’s a faff! [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 2:42 pm
This proposition was well articulated in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
I will now discuss the Wuhan (Liu Li v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 11:32 am
Additional Resources: GEICO v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
One of those people is Justice Hearn. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:10 am
Bottom line The corporate leaders’ strong response is instructive and significant. [read post]
