Search for: "Samsung"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 6,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2021, 6:00 pm
Those standards led to the absurd result that Apple could disgorge Samsung’s profits on its smartphones because they employed rounded rectangular shapes. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:51 am
Members include Duracell, Dell, Samsung, Energous, and Qualcomm. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Design Patents: Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am
: CJEU ruling in Stichting De Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, Mijndert van der Lee and Hananja van der Lee (JIPLP) Finland Finnish ISP ordered to block The Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) France Government concludes investigation following anti-piracy data breach (TorrentFreak) Germany Second BGH decision on Google Image search – I ZR 140/10 Vorschaubilder II (IPKat) (1709 Copyright Blog) Netherlands ‘A different perspective on Samsung v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
Consequently, the UKSC agreed with the lower courts that UP did not have to offer the same royalty rates to Huawei as it had given to Samsung in a 2016 licence. 4. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 2:50 am
That second ITC complaint went to trial last month and involves partly the same patents as the Samsung case in California. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:58 am
Their volumes are probably too low to buy directly from Samsung. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:24 am
Samsung case, 971 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1992). [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:47 pm
“While none of [Power Integrations’ evidence can be directly linked to the particular HP printer, Acer notebook computer, or Samsung notebook computer Power Integrations introduced at trial as representative acts of direct infringement, it was sufficient to allow the jury to find that Fairchild had induced its customers (including HP, Acer, and Samsung) to infringe as a class. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:07 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:40 am
In a recent post, Michael Thesen wrote about the ongoing patent litigation between Samsung and Apple – with a focus on a German preliminary injunction based upon a European Design Registration. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:31 am
The administrative court issued its decision in March 2012, rejecting Samsung Italia’s claim on all grounds. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
Les premiers déposants sont Siemens (2235), Philips (1759), Samsung (1733), BASF (1638) et LG (1493). [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 7:41 am
Areas now able to be accessed with MEDAL include the Secure Folder (Samsung), Private Space (Huawei), KeyChain (iOS), Email (Android and iOS), third-party application data, system and application logs, and deleted content. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 4:13 am
Indeed, in 2005 Samsung surpassed Sony as the world's Number 1 electronics brand, small wonder when one considers that 25% of the company's employees have a Ph.D. or equivalent.When high intelligence, realism, hard work and capital are combined, a very likely result is success. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:21 am
For those less familiar with the history of this case, the action began back in March 2014 when Unwired Planet (UP) sued Google, Huawei and Samsung for infringement of five standard essential patents (and one non-essential patent), acquired from Ericsson. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm
Samsung and Google both make tablets that use the Android operating system. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:43 pm
Patent Nos. 6,979,210 (the ‘210 patent) and 7,090,515 (the ‘515 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): AIPTEK International, Inc. of Taiwan Aluratek, Inc. of Tustin, California Archos S.A. of France Archos, Inc. of Greenwood Village, Colorado Bluestar Alliance LLC of New York, New York Centon Electronics, Inc. of Aliso Viejo, California Coby Electronics Corporation of Lake Success, New York Corsair Memory, Inc. of Fremont, California Emtec Electronics, Inc. of Lew… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:38 pm
Samsung sought disclosure of the communications between the patent owner and the patent agent. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:40 am
I criticize the core holding as over-protecting intellectual property, connecting the case to others, including Apple's recent victory over Samsung. [read post]
