Search for: "State v House"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 28,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
“Sundholm v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:18 am
State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:03 pm
Ruthann Robson blogs over (here) at Constitutional Law Profs about the decision in Planned Parenthood of Kansas v. [read post]
2 Jul 2006, 8:43 pm
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in the case of Bond v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:46 am
Tim D’Annunzio US House of Representatives District 12– Greg Dority v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Could a state mandate a 24-hour waiting period for an abortion? [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:49 am
Ratonel et al v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:24 am
Ayinla v London Borough of Newham. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:09 am
Coedbach Action Team Ltd v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2010] EWHC 2312 (Admin) – Read judgment A recent decision of the High Court, relating to a challenge to planning permission for a power station, could significantly limit access to environmental justice for local community groups. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:46 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 9:34 am
” (Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 5:30 am
State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:14 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 7:37 am
Michelle V. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
State v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:17 am
Pointing to state statute, the County’s Housing Element and the findings in the environmental impact report, the appellate court concluded that the rezoning was in the public interest. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm
The Circuit Judge took into account that under a secure tenancy a landlord would have an implied right of access to carry out works to avoid injury ( McAuley v Bristol CC (1992) QB 134 and Lee v Leeds CC (2002) 1 WLR 1488 ). [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 5:01 am
A recent Tax Court case, Jackson v. [read post]
