Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK" Results 4981 - 5000 of 7,224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 7:10 am
" When a an intellectual property attorney makes a federal trademark, copyright or patent infringement claim in a state court case, removal to federal court is generally appropriate. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:53 pm by Adrian Lurssen
With 500 lawyers and government affairs professionals, Akerman serves clients throughout the United States and overseas from Florida, New York, Washington, D.C., California, Colorado, Virginia, Nevada, Utah, and Texas... [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
Our State-Based Trade Secret Regime Unlike trademarks, copyrights, and patents, trade secrets are not governed primarily by federal statute. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:20 am by jwpravel
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Smithsonian American Art Museum are sponsoring a FREE Inventors Symposium, Thursday, October 27, 2011 and Friday, October 28, 2011. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
McCoy United States Patent and Trademark Office in Detroit, had already been selected.Politicians from Texas and California are also active. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:15 pm
Los Angeles - Two and a half years after initially attempting to trademark the word 'Tweet', Twitter has finally been awarded exclusive rights to the trademark by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:44 pm
Los Angeles - The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has recently registered a trademark to Microsoft Corp. for its design for a retail store that will sell tech-related products. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:43 pm by tom
When a patent application is filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the applicant currently must sign a Declaration attesting to several things. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:15 am by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
In the United States, business is not conducted without lawyers. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat)   United States US General US signs ACTA (Ars Technica) KEI comment on US signing of ACTA (KEI) Private federal civil actions for trade secret infringement (Patently-O)   US Patent Reform Big laws, small businesses: what will be the AIA’s impact (IP finance) Sarnoff: Derivation and prior art problems with the new patent act (Patently-O) America Invents Act: How the new law impacts your clients and your patent… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:05 am by Russell Beck
Unlike patents, trademarks, and copyright, there is no federal trade secret statute. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:25 pm
Apple initiated this whirlwind of international patent litigation back in April, when it filed suit against Samsung in the United States alleging that the Samsung Galaxy line of products infringed on a number of Apple utility and design patents, copyrights, and trademarks relating to its iPhone and iPad. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am by Ron Pollock
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Newsru LTD (The IP Factor)   Netherlands Major Usenet provider ordered to remove all infringing content (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom Expedited trials in English patent actions – HTC v Apple (judgment of Arnold J on 19th September 2011) (Kluwer Patent Blog) Newzbin2 team up with The Pirate Bay to defeat site blocking (TorrentFreak) EWHC (Pat): Halliburton gets simulation patent after all: Halliburton Energy Services v Comptroller-General of… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:56 am by Phil
Notably, Cellectis’ announcement failed to mention that the United States Patent and Trademark Office has ordered a reexamination of the ’372 patent, agreeing with Precision that there are substantial new questions regarding patentability that require further examination by the USPTO. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:55 pm by Paul F. Prestia
Significant non-legislatively induced workload increases may be expected as the trend continues toward more interests in patents and the increasing technical complexity of new inventions and as waves of Chinese patent applications reach the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Notably, the exam- iner never raised the question whether Singh was § 102(a) prior art, never addressed that argument, never ex- pressed any concerns as to any alleged deficiencies with the Declaration, and never issued a rejection using Singh as § 102(a) prior art.In this case, the CAFC noted:In a series of opinions, both this court and our predecessor court, the United States Court of Customs & Patent Appeals (“Patent Court”), have… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 1337(a)(3), which provides:[A]n industry in the United States shall be con- sidered to exist if there is in the United States, with respect to the articles protected by the pat- ent, copyright, trademark, mask work, or design concerned—(A) significant investment in plant and equipment;(B) significant employment of labor or capi- tal; or(C) substantial investment in its exploitation, including engineering, re- search and development, or… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:54 am by jwpravel
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will host the 2011 National Trademark Expo on Friday, October 14th, and Saturday, October 15th, at the USPTO’s headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. [read post]