Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 4981 - 5000 of 21,068
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2019, 3:42 am
 Scottsdale Capital Advisors Corporation, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
The Appeal The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Becker, reversed Judge Kelly’s exclusion of the Nicholson Report, in an opinion that is still sometimes cited, even though Downing is no longer good law in the Circuit or anywhere else.[7] The Court was ultimately not persuaded that the trial court had handled the exclusion of Nicholson’s Report and its meta-analysis correctly, and it remanded the case for a do-over analysis. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
The goods and services at issue were addressed to the general consumer, with some of them targeting children and adolescents. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:03 pm by Alex Moss
And virtually none of the applications originating in China are “triadic patents” (patents filed jointly in the patent offices of Japan, the United States, and European Union), which are widely considered “the gold standard” for patent protection. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:08 am by Marty Lederman
 * * * *The Supreme Court explained, in the second of its ACA cases (King v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Because the United States continues to enforce the ACA (as its own brief noted), there is still a case or controversy, as there was in Windsor v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 12:24 pm by Kevin
Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of the United States of America (Case No. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
He failed to show that his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York were not time-barred (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 300, 306 [2002]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
He failed to show that his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York were not time-barred (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 300, 306 [2002]). [read post]