Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 9,057
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 6:44 am
Bloomberg BNA’s Labor and Employment Blog reports on the impact of the Court’s June ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:27 am
Now, on to the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter: Legal sector loses 1400 jobs in August GoDaddy outage takes down thousands of websites Ontario dad wants option of pulling kids out of class based on religious beliefs - Calgary Herald Arizona Supreme Court rules tattooing is constitutionally protected free speech How the new Anti-Spam Act will affect your business Players' union attempts to block NHL lockout in Alberta, Quebec Too Big… [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:13 am
Supreme Court decision in June upholding the requirement. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:04 pm
[JURIST] The Arizona Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Friday that the married owners of a prospective tattoo parlor could bring suit against the City of Mesa for violating the couple's constitutionally protected rights to freedom of expression in denying their business a zoning permit. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:13 am
You have the right to get ink -- at least, according to the Arizona Supreme Court, in a holding that says tattoos are a form of protected speech. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:42 am
A federal district court in Arizona has declined to find that Arizona’s law requiring secret ballot union representation elections is preempted by the NLRA. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 8:35 am
In an important free speech case yesterday, the Arizona Supreme Court held that tattooing is protected free speech under the First Amendment and Arizona's state constitution. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 6:54 am
"Arizona Supreme Court in Mesa case: 1st Amendment protects tattoos; Mesa case must go back to county court. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
On Wednesday, a federal judge on the United States District Court for the District of Arizona declined to block temporarily the enforcement of the “show me your papers” provision of Arizona’s controversial immigration law, the only challenged provision of the law that the Supreme Court did not strike down on preemption grounds in its decision this past Term in Arizona v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:19 pm
See this order. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:57 am
On remand from the Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
Supreme Court upheld this part of Arizona’s law, but the open borders movement insisted the provision be blocked because it could lead to racial discrimination. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:25 pm
Supreme Court upheld the provision granting local police to check the immigration status of a person. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:24 pm
The petition in that case asked the Supreme Court to hear it without waiting for review by the Second Circuit Court in New York. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:53 am
The supreme court shall adopt, after public hearings, and administer for all justices and judges who file a declaration to be retained in office, a process, established by court rules for evaluating judicial performance. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Arizona father’s rights attorneys are watching an international child custody case unfold. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
The editorial board of The New York Times criticized the Court’s decisions in Citizens United, Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom PAC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
Here is some news from the Arizona Supreme Court: Last year, the Arizona Supreme Court approved new mandatory probate forms, Fee Guidelines for lawyers and fiduciaries, and minimum training requirements for lawyers handling probate matters, investigators, and non-licensed fiduciaries. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:33 pm
§ 201, et seq., the Arizona Wage Act, A.R.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
Clinton wanted to make him Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
