Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 4:07 pm
Since the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Richardson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 7:55 pm
On September 9, 2008, the Third Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:19 am
In the Michigan case, Berghuis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:05 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court held in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm
The Hilary Term has been a quiet one in English media law. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 10:15 am
Horne v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 10:28 am
Hilton v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
He is a research associate at the CCP Research Foundation and also works as international counsel in an English law firm. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 11:06 am
(Plus, I learned from a footnote in the opinion that the first res ipsa loquitor case was allegedly not the famous English "barrel-rolling-out-of-the-warehouse" case, but was actually a common carrier case in which the axle of a stagecoach broke. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:29 am
While it is correct that this is one ordinary meaning of “tunnel”, another ordinary meaning as given by the Oxford English Dictionary (“OED”) is “a road-way excavated underground”. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
Supreme Court from 1801–1835 In his opinion, Justice Marshall observed that at the time of the discovery of the continent by Europeans [note he qualifies his use of the word “discovery”]: …the whole of the territory in the letters patent described, except a small district on James River, where a settlement of Europeans had previously been made, was held, occupied, and possessed in full sovereignty by various independent tribes or nations of Indians, who were the sovereigns… [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
That story, by William Neuman, reported how Bimbo Bakeries, maker of Thomas’ English Muffins, enjoined a high-ranking executive from working for arch-rival Hostess. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
On the question of whether the decisions to authorise continued segregation fall within the ECHR, art 6(1) to mean the prisoner is entitled to a hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal, the Supreme Court noted that this depends on whether the decision involves the determination of a civil right recognised by English law. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 6:36 am
Another more recent example, in the English High Court, involved the actor Johnny Depp, who sued a newspaper that published a story alleging he was a “wife-beater”. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:05 am
Limited and others v Yeda Research and Development Company Limited and others [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat) - the first application of Actavis v Eli Lilly in the Patents Court. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 4:03 am
Stakeholders, and lovers of the interaction of competition v contract law in the SEP space, will be fastidiously watching this case for the Munich court's response, as well as how the Unified Patent Court will be applying Huawei v ZTE in future cases. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Telenor's decision follows the landmark ruling of the Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal last year ordering Swedish ISP, Bredbandsbolaget (B2) to block access to The Pirate Bay and Swefilmer: Swedish ISP Telenor will voluntary block The Pirate Bay.Kat Neil Wilkof wonders whether, in an age where image is (nearly) everything, the name of the street can have an economic and reputational effect on the parties involved, following the recent relocation of a notable local law firm to a… [read post]
