Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 5,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 12:17 pm
— (1) Subject to subsections (5) and (8) below, a person connnected with a child under the age of sixteen commits an offence if he takes or sends the child out of the United Kingdom without the appropriate consent. [(2) A person is connected with a child for the purposes of this section if— (a) he is a parent of the child; or (b) in the case of a child whose parents were not married to each other at the time of his birth, there are reasonable grounds for… [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm
of private performances, outside the control of the copyright holder. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 7:32 am
" Pacho v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
Highland v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:07 pm
In their decision, the BIA cited the 9th Circuit Case of Lemus-Galvan v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 5:01 am
We are discussing Kurz v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm
” Harking back to Moran v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
” [29] In essence, not only represented traditional committees would be subject to the disclosure rules, but also ad hoc committees. [30] V. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Ford, in 1975, Stevens is the fourth-longest-serving Justice in the Court’s history; the record holder is the man Stevens replaced, William O. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Artesia News, March 11, 2010 he U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:27 pm
The first case, Holder v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:01 am
According to the NYT, Senator Kyl was shocked, shocked to learn that AG Holder had not listed in his pre-confirmation questionnaire his "signing" of a brief in the Padilla v Rumsfeld case. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:50 am
Apache Corporation v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:21 am
However, opportunism embraces a larger community of respondents and is not limited to trademark holders. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:37 pm
The author of the "majority" opinion (Judge Noonan), does one thing that the right wing will like (finding that credit card fraud its categorically an offense of moral turpitude) but another that it'll hate (ordering the IJ to decide whether the petitioner should be granted asylum but to assume that everything he says is true). [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:23 am
He also clarified that the issue of registration only affects the ability of the foreign copyright holder to collect statutory damages, not file suit, an element I was admittedly unclear on. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
" Apache Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:36 am
( R. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:09 pm
" According to the Court, jurisdiction was permitted because (1) the plaintiff could not reasonably argue that litigating in Maryland is burdensome when he enrolled the foreign judgments, (2) Maryland has an interest in adjudicating a matter involving a Maryland policy holder, (3) no other identifiable forum exists for the insurance company, (4) states have an interest in adjudicating claims in a single action, and (5) the only social policies involved in the action concerned… [read post]
