Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 7,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2021, 5:02 am
It does not order the removal of such information for legal decisions that have been reversed. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
The judge seemed to be flying a kite here, since there was no suggestion that adultery – the subject matter of the particular case – may ever be re-criminalised. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm
The plaintiff re-filed his remonstrance and the House Clerk eventually published it in the House Calendar on December 31, 2020. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 11:34 pm
"You're scared to go out places. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 8:37 am
Throughout that period, U.S. officials endlessly defended his actions in public, and did little in private other than to urge restraint. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am
“We’ve been listening to each other, and we’re learning from one another,” he said. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:13 am
The case is on appeal to the Seventh Circuit, oral argument took place last October, and a decision is expected imminently. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:39 am
The incumbent will regularly engage in extensive communication with officials across the university on issues related to funding, space, events, HR, and more. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:45 am
Dodge's decision to wear his MAGA hat on school grounds within weeks of the Trump Administration's loud and publicized initiative to deport as many immigrants as possible was an affront to Wy'east's agenda of cultural inclusivity and interest in creating a safe place for ELL [presumably English Language Learner -EV] students. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
The press affects the societal purpose of the First Amendment by serving as a ‘powerful antidote’ to any abuses of power by governmental officials and the related purpose of keeping officials elected by the people responsible to all the people whom they were selected to serve. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
"We're all working to the same end," he said. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:37 pm
But the Center for Public Integrity gives Montana an “F” grade for its conflict disclosure laws, which make it difficult for the public to spot self-serving votes or sanction those who enrich themselves in public office. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Knowledge sue US Trade Representative over allegedly insufficient disclosure under US Freedom of Information Act concerning Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement negotiations: (EFF), (Public Knowledge), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Ars Technica), (Excess Copyright), (Public… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:18 pm
MARTIN O'MALLEY: Well, those other governors will have to respond and have to be held accountable to their public for their decisions. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
” In support of this mission, the vision of USEUCOM is to be “a combat-ready, warfighting theater that is postured, relevant, and ready” and that is “capable of delivering decisive battlespace effects, at speed, and in all domains. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 4:31 am
Again, I have my suggestions, but there are a range of possibilities, and I think it would be helpful to have an official administration position to discuss and debate. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Scalia expressed concern in his opinion that absent the safeguard of cross-examination, “a forensic analyst responding to a request from a law enforcement official may feel pressure – or have an incentive – to alter the evidence in a manner favorable to the prosecution. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 12:22 pm
Though I’m not sure all the reasoning in the DVD Copy Control Ass’n decision is correct, it is the view of the California Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 1:09 pm
To make that decision, the guidance creates a committee that includes not just the lawyers but top officials and a privacy officer, further clogging an [read post]
