Search for: "John Doe V" Results 5001 - 5020 of 14,825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript offers a graphic explainer for City of Hays v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 3:08 am
Lundy Law, LLP, Opposition No. 91210158 [Opposition to registration of the slogan REMEMBER THIS NAME for legal services on the ground that the applied-for mark does not function as a mark and cannot be perceived by consumers as a source identifier].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Looking forward to full reports from attendees.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:59 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
For example, if a client really wants his lawyer to call John Doe as a character witness, but the lawyer considers Doe to be an obvious liar who is vulnerable to utterly discrediting cross-examination, the client should not have the right to force the lawyer to call Doe to the stand. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
For forms of privilege that is not historically protected on the basis of class or category, the courts have employed the test originally set out in the 1961 tet by John Henry Wigmore, as described by the Court in R. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, since the retainer agreement executed between plaintiffs and the Aboulafia firm, which constitutes “documentary evidence” within the purview of that section (see generally Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 84-85 [2d Dept 2010]), clearly limits the firm’s representation only to commencing a property damage claim against Marine. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:00 am by Hennadiy Kutsenko
The Queen 202 SCC 46 – whether there is a reasonable expectation of profit from the alleged business activity. [3] Olivier Fournier and John J. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
         INTRODUCTION   A groundbreaking framework has emerged to address the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights.[1]  Developed by Harvard professor John Ruggie, the United Nations Secretary-General’s Special Representative on Business and Human Rights, and grounded in extensive research and broad consultation with the private sector, non-governmental… [read post]