Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 88,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 2:56 am
The word "best" adds a inherently tricky wrinkle to the stated hypothesis about the obligations of state-funded law schools: "best" in what sense(s)? [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 11:42 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am
See Dawson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 17 (2005), quoting United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm
2011 will surely go down as the Year of the Class Action in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:47 pm
The contract included a work-made-for-hire agreement and so the state is legally the author and copyright holder (if copyright persists). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:36 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:18 pm
Last week, the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in Delta Canal Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:19 pm
(David Kopel) As VC readers know, an all-star cast of constitutional legal scholars, including three Volokhians, submitted an amicus brief in NLRB v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:26 am
The Flores court correctly noted that, “since Fisher, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Concepcion has altered the legal landscape substantially. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:41 am
NEUSTADT ) v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
ARTICLE V(1) Where either contracting State imposes the tax by reason of the nationality thereof or the domicile therein of a decedent or a donor or a beneficiary of a decedent's estate or of a gift, such State shallallow against its tax (computed without application of this Article) a credit for the tax imposed by the other contracting State with respect to property situated at the time of the transfer in such other State and included for the taxes… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:13 pm
United States (United States fiduciary duty)Akiachak Native Community v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He invites the Court to acknowledge that one of those requirements is the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament. 15.57 The Lord Advocate notes that if the legislative consent convention was not meant to be legally binding, what was the point of the UK Parliament introducing it in statute? [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 6:32 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 9:25 pm
In Wooten v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
The directive was created as a result of United States v. [read post]
