Search for: "Little v State" Results 5001 - 5020 of 26,877
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Because the court left open the question, there’s relatively little guidance as to what additional measures online platforms are actually required to take. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
  But in the meantime, add this to the list of who's on one side and who's on the other.Plus, this case has a neat little twist that I haven't seen before. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
”  Never, but apparently, not for long.On June 20 of last year, in Gundy v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Samuel Bray runs down the amicus briefs and related articles discussing “the scope of the injunction” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674, and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser explains why Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 3:15 pm by Amy Howe
In some ways, next week’s consolidated oral argument in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:40 am by Kevin
But—maybe because that seems a little shady? [read post]