Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 5001 - 5020 of 120,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2018, 8:35 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Participants may use sold house data for (1) estimate of a particular property for a particular client; and (2) to advertise their own past sales. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:57 pm by Christine Corcos
An alternative analysis, where the missing conjunction is modeled as a covert proform, is proposed, and consequences of the analysis are considered – in particular, I present a novel argument that the US Supreme Court’s controversial decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:23 pm
An alternative analysis, where the missing conjunction is modeled as a covert proform, is proposed, and consequences of the analysis are considered – in particular, I present a novel argument that the US Supreme Court’s controversial decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
Following the US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist) the term “original” entails two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:43 am
She or he may take the private view, if reversed, "Lord forgive them for they know not what they do". [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:10 am
Against this backdrop, the Court suggests that a "one size fits all' patent system may be too blunt a legal instrument; what works as a matter of patent law in one industry may not work in another. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:56 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
So the other particularly fascinating item – to me, anyway – that popped up in my twitter feed while I was on vacation was this important decision by the Ninth Circuit, Demer v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
Now suppose that the US Supreme Court had endorsed ISL in Moore. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:55 am by Evan George
”  The trial in Montana was the first of many to come and the proceedings tell us a lot about how future trials might go, including the upcoming trial in Navahine F. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:11 pm by Mathieu Canuel
We will keep an eye on further developments and share them as they become available. [1] Marchetta v Tribunal administratif du travail, 2023 QCCS 3254 [2] The corporation’s name was Visual Training Solutions Inc. when the facts occurred. [3] Marchetta v Visual Training Solutions Inc., 2021 QCTAT 2402. [4] Marchetta v Visual Training Solutions Inc., 2021 QCTAT 5451. [read post]