Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 10,569
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
Robert Welch, Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
It matters not whether the original indictment was good or bad. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
It matters not whether the original indictment was good or bad. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 9:31 pm
For me, the lesson is that professionals matter. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
While it is the position of the appellants that Section 34a is not self-executing, it really doesn’t matter because 34a provides for implementing legislation, and by its own terms R.C. 4111.14 was that implementing legislation. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 10:06 am
Robert Redford is too old — 79, when Bryson, in the book, is 44. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 10:25 am
This is Robert Mansour. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 10:25 am
This is Robert Mansour. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 10:25 am
This is Robert Mansour. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
But he didn’t stop there. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 10:39 am
Not only did the Ninth Circuit overturn Judge Robert Jones's decision, they reassigned the case. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
Editor's Note: Janet T. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 1:54 am
In another matter, an attorney got into an ostensibly settled case and his first letter admitted that while he didn’t have the file, when he got it, he was going to serve a discovery deficiency letter (even though his predecessor felt discovery was complete), not knowing whether there was a deficiency. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
Dorf, a Justia columnist, is the Robert S. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:02 am
I was recently speaking to a lawyer involved in a nine year-old divorce matter (yes, nine years – don’t pass out) and trial is just beginning this month. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:23 am
However general this sounds, Bennett is clear enough that the living Constitution (somewhat paradoxically) is a matter of history – something that already has happened in the course of Supreme Court adjudication that (presumably) can’t be altered. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
That makes it a speech restriction, and one that doesn’t fit within any of the exceptions to the free speech principle. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:00 am
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, opined that it doesn’t matter if a reasonable person would feel threatened, Roberts said that the Pennsylvania court had to determine if Elonis actually intended to kill her and do all of these gross things to his ex. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:14 pm
But, as retired judge Robert Alsdorf says, “Being willing to negotiate doesn’t make you look weak. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
And even if this charade, of calling Fleming as a fact witness, were some sort of tactical cat-and-mouse litigation game between government and defendant, certainly the trial judge should have taken control of the matter by disallowing a witness, not tendered as an expert witness, from offering opinion testimony on arcane statistical issues. [read post]
