Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 15,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
Clear principles limiting the exercise of this power were established in the case of R v Governor of Durham Prisoner ex parte Haridal Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704 (now often referred to as “the Hardial Singh principles”). [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
In the 1980 case of Stone v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
Following up my earlier posting on Justice Kennedy's majority opinion today in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:07 am
Johnson, is what gives the flag its power. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:51 am
Levine v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 12:25 am
Four years ago, the European Court of Human Rights criticised the policy in Hirst v UK, which arose out of the 2002 case of R v Home Secretary ex parte Hirst. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:29 pm
Even asking whether “We the People” in the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
It’s Jama v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
NFIB v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:15 am
The American people largely went along with this accretion of power. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm
" (Mossoff, at 5) (quoting NGS American, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 7:47 pm
Garland and Firebaugh v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
On Justia's Verdict today, you can read the second of a two-part series in which I analyze the Supreme Court's recent decision in Howes v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
“The proposals for “Reform of the Information Commissioner’s Office” comprise a power grab to influence (or determine) what the Commissioner’s duties and priorities should be. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Monday’s Supreme Court ruling in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:19 pm
Hoffman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
This was the case in Fox Lake Cree Nation v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 4:10 pm
In V v Associated Newspapers [2016] EWCOP 21, published on 25 April, Mr Justice Charles, Deputy President and Judge in Charge of the Court of Protection, uses the word ‘prurient’ several times about the press coverage of earlier judgments in the case of ‘C’, the woman who ‘lost her sparkle’. [read post]
