Search for: "R. J. F." Results 5001 - 5020 of 6,939
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Chaffe the English Court of Appeal finally raised doubts whether there was a wrongful removal of the child from England to the French overseas department La Réunion at all. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:24 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3, E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5, H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2, P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:38 am
" "Uh, I guess that's like borderline hip-hop and R&B. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
R., 2023 QCCA 825Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Mark Schrager, Stephen W. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
“[R]egulation cannot, in a liberal democracy, force viewers to consumer media products they do not think they want in the name of the public interest,” argues Goodman.[16] (This dilemma creates additional practical problems for proposals to expand public interest regulation, which will be discussed in Sec. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
CIKLIN, C.J., and GERBER, J., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.Source: http://www.4dca.org/opinions/July%202016/07-13-16/4D15-1778.op.pdfFighting for you or a friend. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:00 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
“Como uma forma de vingança ou até despeito mesmo, eles procuram um jeito de atingir a integridade física, moral e psicológica da vítima”, explicou a policial, completando que, atualmente, já existe um avanço nos métodos de apuração deste tipo de delito. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Speaker: William F Patry (Chief Copyright Counsel, Googl [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, A 84 (EPC 1973) together with R 29 (EPC 1973) requires a claim to give all the essential features that are necessary for defining the invention.This requirements has also been affirmed in decision G 1/07 [4.2.2; 3.3.1 – should read 4.3.1]. [read post]