Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 9,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2015, 6:03 pm
In an end-of-the-term flurry that was not lacking in forceful dissents, Chief Justice Roberts’ dissent in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 12:00 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
This was the approach first taken by the Warren Court in 1955 in Williamson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
On July 2, 2015, in Glatt v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
On July 2, 2015, in Glatt v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:26 am
And, as the court previously reasoned in Akron v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:16 am
This was the argument in a recent Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case of Sarkisian v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:55 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision in 1977, by a 2-1 margin, with each judge writing separate opinions. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
The Court held, as a matter of law (citing Creed-21 v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 8:59 am
The Federal Circuit also found that the district court might have the power to award fees based upon its inherent judicial power. [read post]
Guest Post: In Rush to Invalidate Patents at Pleadings Stage, Are Courts Coloring Outside the Lines?
1 Jul 2015, 3:30 pm
I commend the district court’s adherence to the Supreme Court’s instruction that patent eligibility is a “threshold” issue, Bilski v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Just as, in our era, prospective Supreme Court Justices must explain how their judicial philosophy approves of the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:22 pm
The federal district court and, then, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed (although begrudgingly on the basis that Brulotte was "counter-intuitive" and "unconvincing"). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
Save Our Heritage Organization v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Grynberg: courts of appeals are much more comfortable with district courts making those kinds of calls than w/agencies. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:23 am
Last week, the First District Appellate Court issued another decision applying Fifield, holding in McInnis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:23 am
Last week, the First District Appellate Court issued another decision applying Fifield, holding in McInnis v. [read post]
