Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2012, 12:08 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:08 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 7:15 am
Advertising of Austin, LLC (2022) (Thomas, J., joined by Gorsuch and Barrett, JJ., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:21 am
Professor Alan Scott Rau, Mark G. and Judy G. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:24 am
” In The Atlantic, Matt Ford views Maslenjak v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909,… [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909,… [read post]
Judge Andrews Grants Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss as to Past Damages in Patent Infringement Action
19 Apr 2019, 11:28 am
Andrews in Express Mobile, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:43 am
"(Id. at 311 [citations and internal quotation marks omitted; see also Cone v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
Texas’s Rule Prohibiting Access to Preventative Services for Thousands of Women Ruled Constitutional
16 Oct 2012, 11:25 am
The court reasoned that Texas’ restrictions on the breadth of the WHP and on identifying marks were valid and functioned as a direct regulation of a state program. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:46 am
One of the first decisions to address the question was Rutgers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:55 am
In Bond v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
” Like Mr Justice Mann, the judge was live to the marked difference between damages and costs:- “[12]. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:01 pm
Indiaweekly.com, LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:31 pm
Wyers v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:10 am
Lucia v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 12:19 pm
However, the landmark ruling in American Hospital Association v. [read post]
