Search for: "State v. Young"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 8,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Unfortunately, Representative Bill Young’s untimely death resulted in the House not being in session today and the hearing has been rescheduled for next Tuesday when I cannot attend. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
Young, 13-95 (asking whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:20 am
Over at the State Bar today here in Atlanta, the Federal Defender Office is holding its annual Saint Crispin’s Day Seminar. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:55 am
Golaiy, a defendant would cleave to such a wrong-headed approach to a claim for reduction of earning capacity… [56] The plaintiff was a young person when she was injured. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Initially, a young lawyer would be named as the "editor" of a new edition of a work originally authored by someone else. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:03 pm
Young suggests this reasoning was in turn adopted from the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba decision in Golubchuk v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Young, 13-95 (asking whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Huffman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
Discovery Rule, Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling, and "Equitable" Tolling Cannot Save Aredia-Zometa Case
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In Jolly v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
State, 600 So.2d 967 (Miss. 1992); Martin v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:05 pm
See Kasmer v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
Judge Posner, who is out promoting his 40th book, reflected in the interview [see around 8:45-10:45] on his opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm
Arguing for the state of Michigan in Schuette v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Young, 13-95, yet another state-on-top habeas case (this time from the Second Circuit), concerns a whole slew of habeas fun, but in the main asks whether the state can forfeit application of the old rule from Stone v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:06 am
Young v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 10:25 pm
In 2008, the Supreme Court said in Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:10 pm
DRENNEN v. [read post]