Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 20,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2010, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 10:27 am
The court disagreed, siding with the insurers and distinguishing long-standing Circuit precedent in Zeig v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
Yesterday’s case is United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:12 am
He was a tireless advocate for Indian tribes and Indian peoples, successfully arguing on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the United States Supreme Court in Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 1:01 am
Benjamin Harrison was the 23rd President of the United States, serving from 1889 to 1893. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:16 pm
Our observation in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:38 pm
Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office et al, Docket No. 1:21-cv-00899 (E.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:43 pm
Parties may contract to a shortened limitations period so long as the limitation is reasonable. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:15 pm
See: http://municipalminute.ancelglink.com/2017/07/court-upholds-ordinance-prohibiting.html In Youngberg v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
The Parkmerced Development Project calls for long-term redevelopment and major modifications of Parkmerced, a privately-owned 3,221-unit residential rental complex on 152 acres near Lake Merced in southwestern San Francisco. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:05 am
Citing the 1996 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Verity Corp. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Connex-Metalna Management Consulting GmbH, 302 F.3d 358, 365 (5th Cir. 2002) (quoting United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:17 pm
Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Association Inc. v Lexmark International Inc, 421 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2005) United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
West v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
(Basu v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 4:52 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:28 am
In response to instructions from the United States Supreme Court, and in light of the Supreme Court’s pivotal holding in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
Alternatively, as others have suggested he may be playing the long game, sacrificing a chance to strike down the health care law in order to set new markers on issues including the commerce clause and the spending power. [read post]
