Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 5021 - 5040
of 9,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 5:39 am
Siracusano, and United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
United States (08-67): Reversed and remanded, with Justice Stevens writing for the 6-3 Court. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am
C-SPAN posts video of recent testimony by Justices Scalia and Breyer on the Administrative Conference of the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
In relevant part, § 1442(a)(1) provides that `[a] civil action . . . that is commenced in a State court’ may be removed to federal court if the action is against `any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States . . . for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 6:38 am
In the present case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm
On January 14, 2011, the Federal Circuit is scheduled to hear oral argument in Qimonda AG v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of Florida indicted Rutgerson with one count of:`using any facility and means of interstate commerce, [to] knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce an individual who had not attained the age of eighteen years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b). [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
("BWXT"), alleging that it had violated the False Claims Act ("FCA") by defrauding the United States government, in violation of 31 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
The 6-3 arithmetic speaks for itself in this instance.As per the Court’s summary, BREYER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm
Regards, Roy] Introduction On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued what commentators have hailed as a “sweeping” decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:59 am
United States, 505 U. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Then came Booker (argued in the Supreme Court by TChris who writes at TalkLeft) in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am
This subsection’s language permits return to “contiguous” countries that share a border with the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[1]United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 6:40 pm
United States, concluding that the individual mandate is unconstitutional and that, as a consequence, the entire Affordable Care Act is invalid. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
