Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN" Results 5021 - 5040 of 6,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
In June 2008, Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land, invoking the provisions of M.C.L. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:08 am
’s Messenger program infringed asserted claims and infringement was wilful: Creative Internet Advertising v Yahoo! [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
Udow, et al. (07-362), a test of the cutoff of participation in a state program in  Michigan for a residential treatment center for troubled youth in Kingston, Mich. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Amish challenged Wisconsin’s compulsory school law in Wisconsin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In last week’s Supreme Court ruling in Patchak v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In Celebration of Steven Shiffrin's The Religious Left and Church-State Relations. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:03 pm
Casey, he voted to uphold the court's ruling in Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
A southern state, right? [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am by Josh Blackman
Michigan (2006): "Two points should be underscored with respect to today's decision. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:03 pm by Lawrence Taylor
They are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 10:07 am by Jason Shinn
The Decision The court opinion comes from a case in Michigan federal court, Prudential Defense Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
  L O G I S T I C S The National Issues Conference will be held on Friday, October 10th at 3:30 p.m. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:44 am by Doug Allen
 The second class is a group of six statewide classes from Illinois, New York, New Jersey, California, Florida and Michigan, wherein Pella’s failure to disclose the defect is alleged to have violated those states’ consumer fraud laws. [read post]