Search for: "U.S. v. Mark"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 11,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” The justices also agreed on Friday to review U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:05 pm
By a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court reversed the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am
This is an interesting point of reliance since one third party BEYOND mark is registered under Section 66A of the Lanham Act (under the Madrid Protocol), the other is registered under Section 44(e) of the Lanham Act (based on a Canadian registration), where there is no evidence of any use in the United States required for either registration, and since the court’s decision does not reference the actual use of either third party BEYOND mark in the U.S.,… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
See John Osbourne (p/k/a Ozzy Osbourne) v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
” The panel relied heavily on Department of the Navy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
Opening Arguments (podcast) “break[s] down the Supreme Court’s 7-2 ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:11 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 11:42 am
Brown, along with Biden v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
By Mark D. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am
Registration constitutes "prima facie evidence of the validity of the registered mark . . . , of the registrant's ownership of the mark, and of the registrant's exclusive right to use the registered mark . .. . [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
See Graham v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:51 pm
" (internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:03 am
Broadcom threatens U.S. national security. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am
U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:52 am
In Stauffer v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
” U.S. [read post]
