Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 5021 - 5040 of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s note: This post is republished with permission from the RLUIPA Defense blog which can be viewed here: http://www.rluipa-defense.com/home.cfm The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida has denied the City of Jacksonville’s motion to dismiss Church of Our Savior’s (formerly known as Resurrection Anglican Church) RLUIPA suit, and has scheduled the case for trial. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where this initial burden is satisfied, a proponent of a postnuptial agreement suffers the shift in burden to disprove fraud or overreaching. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where this initial burden is satisfied, a proponent of a postnuptial agreement suffers the shift in burden to disprove fraud or overreaching. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 10:37 am by David Kopel
No jurisdiction in the United States has a law like New York City's. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
To demonstrate a violation of Section 1983, a plaintiff must show that a person or entity, acting under color of state law, deprived him of the rights, privileges, or immunities guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States;2. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:23 pm by Neal Fortin
With no regulations, the United States has in effect required non-GM farmers to ‘fence out’ GM crops, placing the economic burden on conventional farming. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm
I am pleased to report about the McBride decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:14 am by Carl Folsom
United States to keep prior drug convictions from triggering certain "mandatory" sentencing enhancements (ACCA and 851 enhancements):At issue in Shepard was whether a state burglary conviction triggered the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), a federal recidivist statute. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am by Marc Whipple
So last Wednesday (March 22, 2017, if you’re joining us late) the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" … The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit provides [under the James v. [read post]