Search for: "Angel v. State"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 5,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
(Discussion Draft, at 76), and a CEQA statute that on its face appears to apply only to state agencies and state projects (Pub. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Daum v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court's 1994 decision in Heck v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
The top officials at Treasury have already set aside all of the broad governmental powers available (claiming we are a "nation of laws"), so let's look at the United States purely as an angel investor which saw a large company faltering and swooped in with an 80% equity investment. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
A recently published decision, Mendoza v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Trump v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
What are states going to do? [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Rains Fellow and Director of the Center for Ethical Advocacy, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles--Michael E. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:06 am
The worst thing would be a hung election, with respect to control of the Senate, for example, like the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am
KF 505 ZC2 D528 2012 Family law, gender and the state / Alison Diduck and Felicity Kaganas. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
The case is Gingery v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
City of Irvine (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1110 (“Royalty”) and Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 and refused permission to appeal. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 8:08 pm
V. [read post]
