Search for: "Court of Appeals, 5th District" Results 5041 - 5060 of 5,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Oct. 25, 2007) (citing Havner, 953 S.W.2d at 717), aff’d in relevant part, 639 F.3d 186 (5th Cir. 2011) Swine Flu- GBS Cases Cook v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
No. 06-16520 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 555 F.3d 790; 2009 U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  If two or more District Courts of Appeal give conflicting conclusions on the same issue the case is sent to the Florida Supreme Court for a defining answer. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:33 pm by Steven M. Taber
– David Mattingly, CNN, July 9, 2010 A federal appeals panel on Thursday upheld a district judge’s order to block the Obama administration’s six-month ban on deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
One Parcel of Land in Prince George’s County,6 a federal district court found standing, noting that not only do the federal courts have a right to determine who among competing claimants is entitled to payments of compensation, but also that this the decision may be made as a preliminary matter. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:02 am
On Wednesday, California's 6th District Court of Appeal threw out a trial court win for Kaleidescape, maker of high-end home entertainment systems that allow people to copy and store DVDs. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
That all changed when the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals remanded a dismissed case back to the trial court, where it will have another chance to proceed. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
S. ____ (2008) (slip opinion, formatted below from .pdf to .doc format by LawPundit), which, although it is a special case of maritime law, definitely sets the logical/legal standards for treatment of punitive damages in other cases in the future.In the Exxon Valdez case, the jury had initially awarded $5 billion in punitive damages, which the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had reduced to $2.5 billion based upon due process considerations. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
& Loan Ass’n, 538 So. 2d 867, 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), the First District Court of Appeal adopted the majority rule that the specification of the amount of credit to be extended, in the absence of expression of a contrary intent, only limits the guarantor’s liability and does not create a condition. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
& Loan Ass’n, 538 So. 2d 867, 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), the First District Court of Appeal adopted the majority rule that the specification of the amount of credit to be extended, in the absence of expression of a contrary intent, only limits the guarantor’s liability and does not create a condition. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:08 pm by Richard Hunt
Judge Brown’s analysis is worth reading because it looks at the 5th Circuit authorities and explains why the “deterrent effect” doctrine is not sufficient to give a plaintiff standing in the absence of any intent to return. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:10 pm by ebcarpenter
“Given the differences we had last session with the sheriffs and the DAs, where we ended up unwittingly at an impasse, we had an incredibly great session with the sheriffs and the DAs,” said Judge Fredericka Wicker of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeal, who has been a leader on the Sentencing Commission, of this year’s deliberations. [read post]