Search for: "M. B.1." Results 5041 - 5060 of 13,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 9:15 am by Jack D
La Cour de cassation (Cour de cassation, 3ème chambre civile, pourvoi n° 09-10287, 20 janvier 2010) dans l’affaire qui lui était soumise – ou le locataire avait bien fait l’objet d’une mutation mais cette dernière n’était pas du fait de son employeur mais de lui-même qui avait pris l’initiative de quitter ses fonctions pour en occuper de nouvelles auprès de la succursale de la banque de France à Rennes,… [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 5:46 pm
B to Reply Br., at 1 (emphasis added).If the Court truly felt this was the case, then I'm confused why the opinion was not simply issued on statutory grounds (and thus avoiding the constitutional question).It's not that I don't find the Court's 8th Amendment analysis to be interesting and well argued; I just wonder why the judge didn't limit her ruling to statutory grounds by holding that the mandatory minimum didn't apply to Farley. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:50 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
I'm not convinced that the effect would be as significant as Fromer suggests—but it also seems like the benefits, even if speculative, might outweigh the costs. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:29 am by David Oscar Markus
— (1) Offenses involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 10:15 am
(b) Section 8(a) of the Technology Administration Act of 1998 (15 U.S.C. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:00 am
According to the proxy statement, the directors received the following compensation: Name Fees Earnedor Paid in Cash(1) ($) Stock Awards(2) ($) OptionAwards(2) ($) All Other Compensation(3) ($) Total ($) Robert M. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 6:48 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Según PRFAA adelantara el 1 de abril de 2013, la Secretaria de Salud de los Estados Unidos (HHS, por sus siglas en inglés), Katherine Sebelius, accedió a la solicitud que le hiciera el Gobernador de Puerto Rico, de un trato más justo y no discriminatorio en la manera en que el Departamento de Salud computa los pagos bajo Medicare Advantage en Puerto Rico. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 5:56 pm
 Apparently, laypeople are powerless against our good looks, wit and persuasiveness and therefore, they must be protected from our sexiness.How else would you explain California Rule 3-120(B), which reads (and no, I'm not making this up):A member shall not:(1) Require or demand sexual relations with a client incident to or as a condition of any professional representation; or(2) Employ coercion, intimidation, or undue influence in entering into sexual… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:58 am by The Legal Blog
Further, under Rule 1 of Order 10, the court can examine only the parties and their advocates, that too at the ‘first hearing’. [read post]