Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2019, 3:30 am
They didn’t go well. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:00 am
For that matter, you likewise can’t use any of the fonts mentioned in this post. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 4:36 am
"Examined" in 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(ii)(B) Does Not Preclude Multiple PCT National Phase Divisionals:The term "examined" in 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(ii)(B) is limited to examination within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 131 and 37 CFR 1.104 in a national application under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) or a national stage application resulting from an international application entering the national stage in the United States under 35 U.S.C. 371.The term "examined" in 37 CFR… [read post]
11 May 2017, 12:59 pm
” But it doesn’t require a showing that the person made a factual allegation with knowledge of its falsehood. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:07 am
In a recent decision, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court – Switzerland’s highest court also in patent matters – dealt with the question of whether the assessment of patent claims is fundamentally a question of law or a question of fact. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:31 am
Hearsay is an out of court statement, uttered by someone other than the declarant, and used to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
B. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 8:31 am
Also, an interesting consequence: a lawyer’s misbehavior for client A might cause the dismissal of a proceeding for client B. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
Spoiler alert: “[i]t is not. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:48 pm
T also submitted an affidavit adopting that of J's. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 8:48 am
Accordingly, the School District added Hassan as a defendant through a Doe amendment - crossing its T's. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:20 am
It doesn’t matter. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The SG’s theory would permit any person who claims to suffer a concrete and imminent injury (no matter how trivial) from any one of its myriad provisions or sub-provisions to challenge it as inseverable based on an underlying claim that the mandate or another provision or sub-provision is unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:28 pm
Indeed, the Court notes that its analysis is compelled because “Graves was not working with individuals,” but that doesn’t matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:28 am
It doesn’t matter if the marriage is falling apart or if the spouses haven’t seen each other for decades; if they are legally married, one spouse may assert the privilege not to be called as a witness against the other. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:34 pm
But knowing that La Follette wasn't ever bound doesn't cause something that didn't happen to have happened in the past. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
As I describe below, I do not think this should matter. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:35 am
If A sends a letter to B, asking him to deliver a package to C at a particular address, the contents of that letter are contents from A to B but mere non-content addressing information with respect to the delivery of the package to C. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 8:43 am
See Part II(b). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:20 pm
Schumann, 111 N.J. 470, 479 (1988) (“[T]he ‘res gestae’ exception may be viewed as a shorthand reference to the principles contained in . . . [read post]
