Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 178,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 3:30 am
So, from the plaintiff’s perspective, absent a Court Order, it’s okay to change one’s privacy settings to hide potentially relevant information. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
October 22, 2012) Defendant hairstylist signed an employment agreement with plaintiff that restricted her from soliciting any of plaintiff’s clients or customers for 2 years. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 6:40 am
October 14, 2021), the Court denied plaintiffs Vertigo Media, Inc. and Remote Media LLC’s motion for preliminary injunction in their action against defendant Earbuds Inc. claiming infringement of several claims of U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 1:35 pm
The trial of a plaintiff's class-action suit against Sheriff Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office is making front page news. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 2:11 pm
The insurer also argued that the bifurcation of the plaintiff’s bad faith claims avoided prejudice. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:18 pm
Applying the plain language of the District of New Jersey’s Local Patent Rules, Chief Judge Wolfson recently ruled in Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:04 am
Taking this and other allegations in Plaintiff’s complaint as true ... the Court properly determined that qualified immunity is not appropriate at this time. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Thus, if a plaintiff wants to wait to determine if the accused infringer's activity results in commercial damage, for example, they will not be penalized if they wait no longer than six years. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
ZulickMonroe County Judge Zulick also addressed the Plaintiff’s objections that the IME doctor’s opinion were not definite. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:58 pm
An Uber driver murdered plaintiff’s son. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 5:27 pm
The court granted the defendant’s motion and denied the plaintiff’s, after which the plaintiff appealed. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court has affirmed that decision in full: When a defendant pays money to a plaintiff in order to settle a case, the plaintiff obtains a "net monetary recovery," and a dismissal pursuant to such a settlement is not a dismissal "in [the defendant‘s] favor. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court has affirmed that decision in full: When a defendant pays money to a plaintiff in order to settle a case, the plaintiff obtains a "net monetary recovery," and a dismissal pursuant to such a settlement is not a dismissal "in [the defendant‘s] favor. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:27 am
Emily S. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:48 am
Despite the chronic nature of the Plaintiff’s injuries he carried on with a stoic attitude minimizing his complaints. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:22 am
The defendants argued that the plaintiff's individual claims had been rendered moot by an unaccepted offer of complete relief made pursuant to FRCP 68. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:20 am
In a variant of the classic game show, Let's Make a Deal, after a jury returned a $100,000 verdict for plaintiff, Judge Ericksen gave plaintiff the choice between a reduced verdict ("remittitur") of $50,000 or another jury trial on the issue of damages. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:57 am
Thus, Plaintiff’s damages, if any, are monetary and could be remedied by the award of interest if Plaintiff ultimately prevails. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:43 am
Still, much like sports enthusiasts will (begrudgingly) show some respect for spectacular plays by an opposing team, there are some employee plaintiffs to whom I cannot help but give a nod. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
The Court’s opinion in Smith notes that “[n]either Smith nor McCollins knew about the other’s suit. [read post]
