Search for: "S. W. v. State" Results 5041 - 5060 of 14,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 12:38 pm by Meg Martin
Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; John W. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:21 am by Sergio Leal
Barclay stated the following: [W]e believe it is consistent with the statute’s purpose to pay a contingency fee, which may be greater than an hourly fee. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm by James Eckert
The due process guarantees in the United States and New York Constitutions require that a defendant be afforded notice of the hearing to determine his or her risk level pursuant to SORA and a meaningful opportunity to respond to the risk level assessment (see § 168-n [3]; People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 136-140). [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:40 am by Judy Selby
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., an Ohio federal court relied on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Reject of three possible approaches: (1) solely determined by national law, given that it’s mandatory and normative; (2) informed by relevant state practice; (3) synonymous with three-step test. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:25 am by Michael O'Hear
With that backdrop in mind, here’s what happened in Minneci v. [read post]