Search for: "Smith v. Smith"
Results 5041 - 5060
of 14,628
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Goodling v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Refusing to use employer supplied equipment that was mandatory in performing the duties of the position results in dismissal of the employee2013 NY Slip Op 08128, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn a number of instances employees have been disciplined because of their unauthorized use of the employer’s equipment in violation of the employer’s rules.For example, a 15-day suspension without pay was recommended as the disciplinary penalty after the worker was found guilty of using a… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:35 pm
Harvard has also published two responses to our article, one by Aaron Tang and Fred Smith, and one by Erwin Chemerinsky and Catherine Fisk. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 2:11 pm
The case, Peugh v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 5:00 am
In the case of Kunkel v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC, cert denied March 20, 2017). [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 10:23 am
The case, Florida v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Fike v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
In the non-precedential decision in the case of Wandell v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:23 am
To me, eventually the entire third-party doctrine spawned from the court's Smith and Miller cases in the '70s (see here for an example of an Obama apologist using those cases to justify the NSA gobbling up everyone's cell-phone metadata ) must be reconsidered in light of the advent of cloud computing in the digital age, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor rightly argued in US v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 3:03 pm
If you need to know what the relevant arguments are from each side in Smith v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:52 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:55 am
"The DJ also features CAFA Conundrum: Diversity is What Counts, by Reed Smith appellate specialists Jim Martin and David de Jesus, about the controversy over the scope of CAFA's appellate review provision, and noting that the 9th Circuit recently joined "the 5th, 6th, and 8th Circuits in holding that CAFA's appellate review provision is limited to remand orders where a party claims diversity jurisdiction under CAFA" in Chan Healthcare Group, PS v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:24 am
In Smith v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:46 am
The United States Supreme Court decision in the 1820 case of United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 1:00 am
In the case of Dinardo v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
11.8 10-8145 Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm
See Smith, Priscilla J., Is the Glass Half-Full? [read post]
