Search for: "State v. E. F."
Results 5041 - 5060
of 8,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Subsection (f) of section 15325 allows a CEQA exemption for “acquisition, sale, or other transfer to preserve open space or lands for park purposes. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
Gates, __ F. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:07 am
§ 11603(e)(2)(A). [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Castilo, 692 F.3d 108, 112 (2d Cir.2012) (citing 42 U.S.C. s 11603(e)(1)(A)). ( The Court observed in a footnote that parents cannot stipulate to habitual residency, see Barzilay v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:07 am
Air Force Technical Sergeant (E–6) Samuel A. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Omnipresent State Sector 552 2. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm
The Appeals Court said, "Having reviewed the dismissal de novo, assuming that the facts stated in the complaint are true, Lambeth v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am
Nichols (1952-present) A Complete Manual of Criminal Forms, by F. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
This update discusses selected litigation, regulations / administrative guidance and pending legislation, on both the federal and state levels, in the following general areas of environmental law: (A) Water Supply, (B) Water Quality, (C) Wetlands, (D) Air Quality, (E) Endangered Species, (F) NEPA, (G) Mining / Oil & Gas, and (H) Cultural Resources.A. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:03 am
Monnin texted Sanders, stating `this is f-ing rigged Randy,’ adding various other statements such as `I'm done. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm
Otter Tail Power Co., 615 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2010); National Parks and Conservation Association Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:34 pm
Org. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
City of Sumner, 548 F.3d 1219, 1227-1228 (9th Cir. 2008) [“across-the-board” storm pipe requirement for all new developments is not an “individual, adjudicative decision” governed by Nollan/Dolan, but “[e]ven if the upgrade could be viewed as a monetary exaction for the cost of upgrading the storm pipe, however, Nollan/Dolan still would not apply. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:20 pm
Harrison, Peter F. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:15 pm
” United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:47 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
” In Matisoff v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am
Texas, 2000 WL 1835396 *2 (Texas Court of Appeals 2000) (`officer's affidavit stated appellant's windshield had a crack in it. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
