Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 5041 - 5060 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Accommodating a Request for Worship Space in the Workplace
28 Nov 2023, 10:33 am by admin
In Groff v. [read post]
Employers' Lawyers - http://www.employerslawyersblog.com/
Legalising the IPAB: The Madras High Court Vindicates!
2 Jul 2013, 3:57 am by Shamnad Basheer
In an order dated March 27, 2013, the Bench comprising Justice Dharma Rao and Justice Aruna Jagadeesan stated that Sections 2(k), 85 and 87 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 fell foul of the law relating to tribunal appointments laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. [read post]
SpicyIP - http://www.spicyipindia.blogspot.in/
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
section 2 refusals are subject to Reed strict scrutiny, Fed. Cir. rules
20 Dec 2017, 1:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The court applied Reed v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Shields, Brooks on Supreme Court 'High Tension,' Health Reform's Future
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I don't see this having that kind of scope, a Roe v. [read post]
Supreme Court - http://www.pbs.org/newshour/indepth_coverage/law/supreme_court/
Madstad Eng. v. USPTO: Challenge to Constitutionality of AIA Fails for Lack of Standing
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society - http://jptos.org
You've Gotcha Mail -- Appellate Term, First Department, Recommends "Time Out" for No-Fault Litigants
4 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
Tri-State Consumer Ins. [read post]
Coverage Counsel - http://nycoveragecounsel.blogspot.com/
A union’s decision to dismiss a meritorious grievance does not constitute a breach of the duty of fair representation in the absence of evidence that the union’s decision was arbitrary or made in bad faith
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
United States v. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
A union’s decision to dismiss a meritorious grievance does not constitute a breach of the duty of fair representation in the absence of evidence that the union’s decision was arbitrary or made in bad faith
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
United States v. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Standing in Trademark Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
14 Apr 2022, 9:21 am by Dennis Crouch
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Wednesday round-up
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Patent Reform Legislation May Shape the Face of Patent Law
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am by Ron Pollock
These provisions will take effect immediately and are applicable to pending proceedings: False Marking Qui tam actions brought by affected private parties for false marking suits will be eliminated. [read post]
Pennsylvania Litigation Blog - http://www.palitigationblog.com/
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK PROTECTION FOR DISTINCT TRADE NAME
24 Jul 2020, 10:42 am by Mavrick Law Firm
 Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - https://www.mavricklaw.com/blog/
TTAB Contingently Sustains 2(d) Opposition Tried Under the Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) Procedure
12 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Facing The World v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
Litigation lottery
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Untitled
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Langton v Sussman & Watkins2025 NY Slip Op 02765Decided on May 7, 2025Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Untitled
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Langton v Sussman & Watkins2025 NY Slip Op 02765Decided on May 7, 2025Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Another Fine Mess: An Assessment of the Most Recent Supreme Court Oral Argument in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in Filartiga v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
US Supreme Court hears oral arguments over ban on firearms for people subject to domestic-violence restraining orders
8 Nov 2023, 12:08 pm by Jonnette Oakes | Washburn U. School of Law, US
The new framework was established by the court in its 2022 decision from New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
The Utah “Hockey Club” – How the New Utah NHL Team is Protecting its Brand Flexibility with Intent-to-Use Trademark Applications
21 Oct 2024, 10:48 am by Holly
Ltd. v. [read post]
Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig Blog - https://www.dbllawyers.com/blog/