Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 5041 - 5060 of 6,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2022, 8:26 am by Russell Knight
During the course of a custody battle, a parent may want to know their child’s exact mental state in order to argue that the child should spend more time with them and less time with the other parent. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:57 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Sweden, no. 28394/95, paragraph 8 to 16); (b) after comprehensive written proceedings (Jussila v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [24] The state expressly states that such a user may not have not have protection within the laws of Michigan, unless there is a state or federal statute that expressly requires a manufacturer to warn. [25] Other states have also chosen to adopt the doctrine. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A., rejected "aiding and abetting liability" under 10b-5 (b). [12, 13] In that 1994 case, the Supreme Court overruled every Circuit Court in finding that no private liability attached to those aiding or abetting violations of Rule 10b-5 (b), which the Court interpreted to require actual misstatements or failure to disclosure coupled with a duty to disclose; that is, there is no secondary liability under 10b-5(b). [14,… [read post]