Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 5041 - 5060 of 9,847
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
  That has already been made clear in the United States, where members of the Republican Party vowed to take countermeasures. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:00 am by Christopher Simon
Forest City Commercial Management, Inc., a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:57 am by John G. Papianou
The United States Supreme Court just made class action defendants’ lives a little easier. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:09 am by Bob Eisenbach
Section 101(35A) of the Bankruptcy Code defines “intellectual property” for purposes of the protections of Section 365(n), using either general terms or references to provisions of the United States Code. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:09 am by Bob Eisenbach
Section 101(35A) of the Bankruptcy Code defines “intellectual property” for purposes of the protections of Section 365(n), using either general terms or references to provisions of the United States Code. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 1:06 am
 As he explained:* The factors that the court had to take into account when deciding whether to set the judgment aside were expressly stated in the CPR r.13.3. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 11:10 am by The Rotolo Law Firm
While UPS employment guidelines state that drivers are required to be able to handle packages up to 70 pounds, the packages handled by Ms. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
This morning the United States Supreme Court decided Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 5:48 pm
United States:[The record in both houses of Congress in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964] is replete with evidence of the burdens that discrimination by race or color places upon interstate commerce.... [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am by Darien Shanske
Phillips responded that it is not the railroads’ burden to show that tax dollars are not being spent fairly; instead, the state created the tax discrimination and therefore has the burden to justify it. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
Proof and the burden of proof, evidence based on word and deed and the application of law to facts in a consistent manner -- these are things that win and lose cases, not the apparent sincerity, commitment or determination of the parties. [read post]