Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 5061 - 5080 of 10,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
Turning to the CEQA issue, the Court held the City’s filing of the NOE did not trigger a 35-day statute of limitations that barred the amended petition because the project materially changed after the City filed the NOE. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by SHG
In all states, under rules created by bar associations and state supreme courts, only people with law degrees and who are admitted to the state bar can provide legal advice and services of any kind. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:37 pm by Amy Howe
But the state court disagreed. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins
We were shocked to learn that Nixon had shortlisted Sylvia Bacon, a judge from Washington, D.C., and Mildred Lillie, a judge from California, as he was faced with two vacancies on the court. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Most puzzling is City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 12:13 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
” Interestingly, the Sekura court also stated that the plaintiff’s allegations of mental anguish over what would happen to her biometric data if the tanning salon went bankrupt also constituted an injury or adverse effect. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 1:21 am by Jared Beck
Beck is a member of the Florida and California Bars, and litigates in other U.S. jurisdictions in conjunction with qualified local counsel. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:40 pm by Thomas Schober
This article is the marvelous work of our current law clerk Kieran O’Day, who will be finishing his stint with us shortly and heading on to clerk with the Supreme Court for the State of Wisconsin! [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm by John Lewis
  The Concepcion decision held that the FAA preempted California law barring the enforcement of class action waivers in the consumer context. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:53 am by Jonathan Bailey
Supreme Court, claiming that Federal copyright law barred McGraw’s claims. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:02 pm
Brown - whether federal labor law preempts a California statute barring employers from using state money to influence union organizing campaigns. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:13 am by David Lynn
The Opinion is the latest of several similar ethical guidelines published by various state courts and bar ethics committees, including the September 2023 guidance from the Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct for the State Bar of California (“COPRAC”), the January 2024 Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 24-1, the January 2024 New Jersey Supreme Court Notice to the Bar, and the April 2024 Report and… [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Zinus”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California setting aside a judgment and injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3). [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
While there have been some non-California-headquartered companies that were sued in California state courts over their S-1 filings, most of the suits brought against IPO companies in California state court have a clear California nexus. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:35 pm by Amy Howe
Taylor had asked the justices to put his execution on hold and give him a new hearing where a state court could consider evidence that he said would prove him innocent. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
The lower federal courts held that abstention was proper and the case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
The lower federal courts held that abstention was proper and the case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Board of Trustees of California State University (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 675, 681-682; it observed the Land Value 77 opinion contained a perfunctory analysis that the statute’s “in part” language did not apply to EIR certification decisions and relied heavily on a legal treatise that failed to discuss or even acknowledge that key language.  [read post]