Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 137,353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2025, 9:03 am
This article does not serve as a substitute for legal advice tailored to a particular situation. [read post]
12 May 2007, 9:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 May 2007, 9:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 7:54 am
Doe Assigned to: Hon. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
" Addressing a procedural matter, the Appellate Division observing the fact DOE's Position Statement was "unsigned and undated hearsay", said "[h]earsay evidence can be the basis for an administrative determination", citing Matter of Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741, and "this Court need not limit our review to the language in the Citywide Panel's decision, as the Panel noted that it had reviewed the DOE's determination as well as… [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
" Addressing a procedural matter, the Appellate Division observing the fact DOE's Position Statement was "unsigned and undated hearsay", said "[h]earsay evidence can be the basis for an administrative determination", citing Matter of Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741, and "this Court need not limit our review to the language in the Citywide Panel's decision, as the Panel noted that it had reviewed the DOE's determination as well as… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:18 am
"] From Starbuck v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:47 pm
In light of United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:40 am
Orco Bank v Proteinas Del Pacifico, 179 AD2d 390, 390; Village Bd. of Vil. [*2]of Pleasantville v Rattner, 130 AD2d at 655). [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
" The court explained that the stipulation signed by Nobile and the attorney acting on behalf of DOE is binding under general contract principles, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, as Nobile failed to show that there was fraud, collusion, mistake or accident with respect to the execution of the settlement by Nobile, or that DOE's counsel lacked DOE's consent to enter into the stipulation. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
" The court explained that the stipulation signed by Nobile and the attorney acting on behalf of DOE is binding under general contract principles, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, as Nobile failed to show that there was fraud, collusion, mistake or accident with respect to the execution of the settlement by Nobile, or that DOE's counsel lacked DOE's consent to enter into the stipulation. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:51 pm
Your question – does last year’s Supreme Court decision of Gross v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:47 am
In a 2017 case, Hively v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 4:07 am
Co-author Brittany Blakey In Headington Royalty, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:43 am
A fascinating exchange between the Alabama solicitor general, Edmund LaCour, and the newest associate justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, occurred during oral argument in a challenge to the Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in Merrill v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 1:05 pm
The Vederi v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Protecting People from Their Own Religious Communities: Jane Doe in Church and State
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Decker v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:37 am
That right does not depend on whether they have been granted status as a refugee [79]-[81]. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:10 am
Leadsinger, Inc. v. [read post]
