Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 5061 - 5080 of 7,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
En première instance, la division d'opposition n'a pas admis un nouveau motif d'opposition soumis tardivement, en l'espèce celui de l'Art 100 b) CBE, le considérant comme non pertinent à première vue. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:02 pm
Em discussão: Saber se estão presentes os pressupostos e requisitos de cabimento da ADC e se os dispositivos objeto da ADC são constitucionais. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:02 am by Susan Brenner
(If you’re interested, you can find the sentencing provisions here.) [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 9:48 am
Maggie’s owner frantically tried to protect her by hitting the dogs on the head with the plastic end of Maggie’s leash. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
If the decision is quashed, the decision maker may be free to re-consider it and as long as the error of law is not repeated and no other error committed, may reach the same decision. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:48 pm
Maggie’s owner frantically tried to protect her by hitting the dogs on the head with the plastic end of Maggie’s leash. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:30 am by Ron
Side A, with all the docs, chose all the seed sets, trained the system, but did not consult Side B re the seed sets. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:25 am by Mark S. Humphreys
B-0002-02 January 2, 2002 TO: REGULATED PERSONS AND ENTITIES, INCLUDING ALL INSURANCE COMPANIES, CORPORATIONS, EXCHANGES, MUTUALS, RECIPROCALS, ASSOCIATIONS, LLOYD'S, HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS, ... [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:09 am by Susan Brenner
Screaming, she said to Emilo, `I hope you're happy,’ `You fucking bitch,’ `He's going to die in jail,’ and `I hope you die. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:02 am by John L. Welch
Likewise, Section 2(b) prohibits registration of marks regardless of whether confusion is involved.Applicant next maintained that Section 2(b) is ambiguous, as evidenced by the PTO’s issuance of three third-party registrations for governmental insignia, as well as by the TTAB’s decision in In re U.S. [read post]