Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 6,812
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2011, 6:22 am
Pollard is responding to the European Court of Human Rights ruling in Sufi and Elmi v UK, in which the court ruled that the situation in Somalia was so dire that except in very limited scenarios it will not be possible to deport people back to the country. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:57 pm
In the past, top-heavy SUVs had the highest driver fatality rates, in part due to the fact that the top-heavy vehicles had a propensity to roll over in certain types of crashes. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm
LawLawLaw includes my observations on trends in technology, IP law (trademarks, domain names, and patents), baseball (long story), and rock 'n' roll (longer story). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
” Solicitor-advocate David Price QC, who acted for reality television star Imogen Thomas in the recent privacy case CTB v News Group, said he favoured a disobedient press at the cost of privacy intrusion. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am
Since the October Term 2010 effectively ended yesterday, retrospectives have started rolling in. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:15 am
Most people associate the Liebeck v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
(It was previously named NMA v Brown, for now Gov. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:07 pm
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Lord Ashcroft v Foley & ors, heard 7-8 June 2011 (Eady J) Modi v Clarke, heard 22 June 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Thomas and Moses LJJ) [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
In contrast the players in Nokia v IPCom are real -- and here we are talking of corporate decision-makers, investors and shareholders -- and their interests are real too. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm
Search ads v. other online ads. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Regards, Roy] Walmart v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
Odom v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:56 pm
I know y’all, it’s been well over a week since my last entry where I said I’d have this entry ready to roll ”on Monday or Tuesday this coming week” — I’d give you an excuse, but you can probably already guess what it is.1 So can we all just pretend that when I said “this coming week” I meant the week after the week that was actually coming at the time? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm
As can be seen in the recent case of Vidal v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:41 am
CBL to lie on a beach for a week reading books about rock and roll and baseball. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:18 am
I'm sure you rolled through some stop signs. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:51 pm
Anyone desiring a copy of Judge Thomson's Opinion in the case of Higgins v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
From an Access to Justice and Civil Right to Counsel perspective, the Supreme Court’s decision in Turner v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
” Let me know when you’re done rolling on the floor laughing. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Roll International Corp. will be reported at CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶64,317. [read post]
