Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 12,939
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 12:27 pm
North Dakota, Bernard v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:21 am
Yesterday, the ECJ has rendered its decision in Case C-498/16 Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
” Pennzoil–Quaker State Co. v.United States, 511 F.3d 1365, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:29 am
See e.g., Baraukas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
If the state can limit taxes in the name of private freedom, then why can the state not also limit zoning as well? [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
Christopher v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
,L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:27 am
| The IPKat team: arrivals, farewells, and news | "Stars" on the football field; less so in the Trademark Office? [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
The case is Small v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
See Menges v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
Indeed, the latter link is to the Minnesota State Bar Association's Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct which set out Rule 7.4(a) (Communication of Fields of Practice) as follows: "A lawyer may communicate the fact that the lawyer does or does not practice in particular fields of law. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:08 am
Kalonga, R (On the Application Of) v The London Borough of Croydon (2021) EWHC 2174 (Admin) While Croydon v Kalonga on terminating flexible tenancies during the fixed term is to be heard by the Supreme Court (our report on the Court of Appeal here), Ms Kalonga’s fixed term has come to an end and Croydon had served the requisite s.107D(3) notice stating their intention not to grant a further term. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:06 am
Kappos, Mayo v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 9:39 am
Golden State Adver. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:53 pm
Grand Canyon Trust v. [read post]
