Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 5081 - 5100 of 15,478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Act does not define “civilization” or “civilized” and does not use the term except in the opening sentence of its preamble. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 8:18 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal were last revised in 2019 and the revised version (RPBA 2020) came into force on 1 January 2020 (see CA/D 5/19 Corr. 1, CA/3/19). [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 7:56 pm by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court: The new petition asks two questions “(1) Whether enhanced damages under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:58 pm by Thorsten Bausch
The forth alleged violation seems to be substantially based on the argument that the UPC does not conform to EU law. [read post]
18 May 2022, 12:43 pm by Tom Lamb
Our law firm has been representing patients and their families in drug injury lawsuits for the past 23 years. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:20 pm
We call it 36-23 for Toledo.Result: The Rockets beat the RedHawks 42-14.This week we are thus far 4-1 in calling the winner and 3-1-1 against the spread.San Jose State (4.6, 4.9, SoS=87) is a 2.5 point underdog at home to Fresno State (6.2, 5.9, SoS=86)Our Call: Our stats favor Fresno State by 5 points. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:25 pm by Dan Flynn
If the Legislature does nothing, the measure does go to a public vote. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Patel 19-706Issues: (1) Whether a court can find Article III standing based on its conclusion that a statute protects a concrete interest, without determining that the plaintiff suffered a personal, real-world injury from the alleged statutory violation; (2) whether a court can find Article III standing based on a risk that a plaintiff’s personal information could be misused in the future, without concluding that the possibility of misuse is imminent; and (3) whether a court can… [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm by Armand Grinstajn
Since the Parent Application as originally filed does not refer to CDRs according to Chotia, the divisional application contains subject-matter going beyond the content of the earlier application as filed and does not meet the requirements of A 76(1). [25] The [patentee] has argued that this decision would contradict decision T 500/01, taken by this Board in a different composition and referring to the patent granted on the basis of the parent application. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:45 am by Brian M. Culnan
  Although Title VII does not require individualized assessment, the guidance notes that the use of such assessment can help employers avoid Title VII liability. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/Wn24Yw2CNA -> You Have No Control Over Security on the Feudal Internet – Bruce Schneier – Harvard Business Review http://t.co/ttJrqYOgcV -> The Law of Internet Intermediaries: Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss http://t.co/LQDryiyj8J -> Does Australia’s Resale Royalty Scheme bring more recognition and income to struggling artists? [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
Lorie Smith "offers her speech for pay and does so through . [read post]