Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 40,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2021, 5:40 am
See Star Buick v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:28 am
Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Supreme Court recently struck down the CDC’s eviction moratorium in counties experiencing high levels of COVID-19 transmission. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Last Week in the Courts Judgement was handed down in Mahmudov v Luisa Goni Sanzberro and ors [2021] EWHC 3433 (QB). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 3:29 am
Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:02 am
Social rent v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:43 am
The Committee attempted to temper the provision through a clause requiring the Central Government or its agency to follow “just, fair, reasonable and proportionate procedure,” taking inspiration from the right to privacy exceptions laid down in Puttaswamy v Union of India (2017). [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:19 am
So, unless we end up in some kind of lock down again (looking increasingly likely, thanks Omicron), evictions will go ahead. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 9:54 am
Absent irrational or obviously unreasonable choices by Congress or federal agencies, judges should stand down. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 5:53 am
Partnership v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 9:35 am
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 6:46 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 Read More [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:06 pm
In State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm
Supreme Court decision allowing Texas’s ban on most abortion services to remain in place, and largely endorsing Texas’s scheme to insulate its law from the fundamental protections of Roe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm
If we accept the state’s argument that it’s an excise tax, then it’s probably an unconstitutional one, because it fails to meet the nexus requirements established in cases like Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm
The ban was the subject of multiple lawsuits including Stone v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
Photo by Nadine Shaabana on UnsplashOverview In Hucsko v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:16 am
While the High Court found Morison liable for trademark infringement as well as passing-off, the trial judge did not make a finding of copyright infringement, stating that as the designer of the device was not called to testify, copyright ownership was not sufficiently proven. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:08 am
In Hogan v 1187938 B.C. [read post]
