Search for: "Grant v Grant"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 104,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:53 am
However, the trial court declined to grant a defense request to dismiss the case altogether at that point. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:28 am
Bantam Books v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
In Reilly v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
In Reilly v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
In Reilly v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:56 am
Six other circuits granted the stay automatically. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
’s papers indicated that an unadulterated version would be provided to the judge, absent “proof in the record that the unredacted affirmation was ever actually provided to the court,” the AD2 thought the dismissal was “properly granted,” and affirmed the outcome.Bet she wishes she could redact that ….# # #DECISIONR. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:55 am
The next day, the Supreme Court concluded in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:02 am
Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) quoted from the 1919 decision in Schenck v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
” Blum v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 3:47 am
Big Catch Fishing Tackle Proprietary Limited and Others v Kemp and Others (17281/18) [2019] ZAWCHC 20 [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 12:52 am
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri (Warner Bros Discovery) regarding the most recent instalment in the Lidl v Tesco IP dispute. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
The Canons of 1603/4 had no statement about what Holy Matrimony was, just details about preliminaries, and place and time of marriage (42); who can grant licences to marry, and other details about licences (101, 102 & 103); and various provisions about divorce (105,106 & 107). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Kiger v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:58 pm
Parady v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
Indeed, as Butler J commented in granting discovery at an earlier stage in Mr Carey’s own case, it “is difficult to draw exact parallels between the law of privacy in this jurisdiction and the law in the neighbouring jurisdiction especially in light of the constitutional aspects of the plaintiff’s claim in these proceedings …” (Carey v Independent News & Media plc [2021] IEHC 229 (26 March 2021)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:55 pm
Last week, the Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari in just one case, Claire Miller v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:57 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
