Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 5081 - 5100
of 13,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 1:11 pm
Depending on what type of business you own, you likely have to file additional or different tax return forms (e.g. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 7:07 am
[Your Firm’s Letterhead] [Date] [Client’s Name] [Client’s Address] [City, State, Zip Code] Dear [Client’s Name], Re: Conclusion of [Legal Matter Description] I am writing to formally conclude our representation of you in connection with [describe legal matter, e.g., “your personal injury case,” “your real estate transaction,” “your divorce proceeding”]. [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 5:24 am
When you’re involved in a Miami truck accident, proving negligence is essential to securing the compensation you deserve. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:27 am
If the paying side suspects it's too big, they're inclined to think they're overpaying. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:27 am
If the paying side suspects it's too big, they're inclined to think they're overpaying. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:27 am
If the paying side suspects it's too big, they're inclined to think they're overpaying. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
Knowledge management (KM) offers a variety of ways for lawyers to capture and more effectively re-use prior work product. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
In re Bose Corp., 580 F.3d 1240, 91 USPQ2d 1938 (Fed. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:36 pm
They still appear to feel they're in a very strong position on contract law. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 8:11 am
Doesn't exceptionally (e.g., not reasonably anticipated) bad traffic count as a legitimate excuse? [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
Even though it didn’t always use “former” or “historic” to precede Old Taylor, but context still indicated references to the physical distillery in a descriptive manner, e.g., “We’re saving a seat for you at ... [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 1:40 pm
See, e.g., Morgan Buildings & Spas, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
The Government should be willing to pay some additional cost to avoid excessive uniformity in design of Federal buildings.The proposed mechanism for giving expression to the order will be the President’s Committee for the Re-Beautification of Federal Architecture. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:23 am
With only narrow exceptions (e.g., markmanship) Grits wouldn't consider it even remotely proper to allow such substitutions. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:42 am
See, e.g., In re S’holders Data Corp., 495 F.2d 1360, 181 USPQ 722, 723 (CCPA 1974) ("Although the Act does not define 'goods,' the definition of a 'trademark' in section 45 declares that it is used 'to identify goods' and section 2 refers to 'goods in commerce.'"). [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 2:37 pm
See, e.g., In re Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., 832 F.3d 1327, 1332 (Fed. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 8:44 pm
Petitioners (the prevailing parties before this Court) cannot be forced to re-litigate these issues nor can the Circuit Court re-adjudicate them. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
These principles were established in the first decisions taken on petitions for review (see e.g. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am
” Courts have routinely evaded the formal requirements of stare decisis—e.g., the Supreme Court’s “special justification” doctrine and the federal courts of appeals’ en banc rule—by simply confining cases to their facts, rather than overruling them outright. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm
The federal statute says that if you try to evade taxes in any manner you're guilty of a felony. [read post]
