Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 10,072
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:10 pm
All claim 6 does is add a “generating said supplied file” limitation to claim 1’s deciding step. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:00 pm
July 7, 2014) (2-to-1 vote) (some paragraph breaks added, some deleted): The majority of other jurisdictions disallow punitive damage recoveries after the tortfeasor has died. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:04 am
2. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
EO 11246 does not affect grants, and the new EO does not impact the administration of federal grants. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
1. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:03 pm
EO 11246 does not affect grants, and the new EO does not impact the administration of federal grants. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:51 am
John R. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
The government would then bear the burden of showing that denial of an exemption “(1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am
In applying this test the court will engage in the following analysis: 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:10 am
The Regulations now require that either we (1) include the following disclaimer in most written Federal tax correspondence or (2) undertake significant due diligence that we have not performed (but can perform on request). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
John Doe had stopped midway down a hill along a featureless stretch of rural road. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:33 pm
§ 1295(a)(1) [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
John W. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am
As for the erroneous identification of tort and regulatory standards, there is of course, much real legal authority to the contrary[2]. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm
Invariably, this “advice” comes from someone who either 1) has no idea what they are talking about and perhaps is motivated by the accused not spending money, or 2) is an interested parties in the outcome – like a police officer who is releasing them from the scene. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm
Invariably, this “advice” comes from someone who either 1) has no idea what they are talking about and perhaps is motivated by the accused not spending money, or 2) is an interested parties in the outcome – like a police officer who is releasing them from the scene. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
OVDP is designed to provide to taxpayers with such exposure (1) protection from criminal liability and (2) terms for resolving their civil tax and penalty obligations. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
But I think this is mistaken. 1. [read post]
