Search for: "Mark Case" Results 5081 - 5100 of 70,951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2011, 2:57 am by John L. Welch
" As to the genericness of the term PLATEFRAME, the Board noted that "[g]iven the posture of this case, the issue of the capability of this combined term has not yet been fully pursued under the two step test. [read post]
1 May 2013, 2:45 am by R. David Donoghue
  At an early stage of the case, both parties strongly contested who first used the mark. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:29 am by Neil Wilkof
To establish a case for trade mark infringement under the TMA, three elements must be satisfied. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
According to case law of the German Supreme Court, it is sufficient if a non-negligible part of the relevant public perceives the stripes as a trade mark. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:51 am by Larry Munn
Bacardi & Company Ltd. and the Registrar of Trade-marks was the second time that Bacardi had sought summary expungement, pursuant to section 45 of the Trade-marks Act, of the trade-mark CASTILLO for use in association with rum. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:20 am
Decision This case concerns Monster Energy in stylized form in Classes 9, 41, and 42 (the “Mark”). [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 3:51 am
The prima facie case may not require much, but it requires at least that. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 1:11 am
  In complex cases, forensic accountants, the divorce attorneys and of course, the client, work together as a team. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:15 am
For our latest addition to the WYHA collection of cases, consider the mark STRIP HOP for "adult entertainment services, namely, live performances by exotic dancers, night clubs and cabarets featuring alcoholic drinks and food. [read post]
With Judgment of 6 April 2022, the Federal Supreme Court upheld FIFA’s claim that the marks “PUMA WORLD CUP QATAR 2022” and “PUMA WORLD CUP 2022” were misleading, ordered these marks to be removed from the register and referred the case back to the Zurich Commercial Court to decide on the question of injunctive relief (see Blog post of June 1, 2022). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 am by immigrationprof
Eight day laborers who sued Mayor Mark Boughton, the City of Danbury, individual Danbury police officers, federal immigration agents, and the United States, alleging that their September 2006 arrests were unlawful and the result of Danbury's anti-immigrant campaign, today announced... [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 12:49 pm by Geoff Schweller
A NCA does not necessarily signal that a whistleblower was involved in the case. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 3:04 pm
My analysis comes from both the case law and citations provided by the authors. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:30 am by Martha Engel
Watch the video, preferably outside of mealtime in case it has a stomach-churning affect on your fruit consumption for the day. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ironically, if the team lost this trademark case, it would be EASIER for others to use the same mark, thus expanding the use of the "disparaging" text, not reducing the use. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
§ 5.1       Generally The Case: Stinson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:44 am
If a trademark owner can put forward such defenses in case of attack for infringement of a third party mark, it means that he is not immune to such attack. [read post]