Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 5081 - 5100 of 10,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2015, 8:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
So no matter the precise content of a final deal, the Administration will be able to insist that these conditions have been met. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am by JB
How do we interpret words in the text for situations that the framers and ratifiers didn't expect or didn’t even imagine would occur? [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:20 pm by Daniel Shaviro
While traveling in the UK last week, the books that I got to read included Knausgaard Book 1, and a biography of Lewis Carroll / social history of the Alice books by Robert Douglas Fairhurst.I liked, and more than that respected, the Knausgaard, but it wasn't a super-easy go when one wants to relax, and I'm not in an immediate rush for Book 2.I am one of those people whose love of the Alice books (and The Hunting of the Snark) goes extremely deep. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:20 pm by Daniel Shaviro
And for once it isn't the movies' fault - the 2010 version, although its wrong-headedness appalled me, can no more diminish it than did the Disney version 60 years ago. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
The publisher of  computer magazine Téléchargement was fined €10,000. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:37 pm by Amy Howe
“Didn’t they realize that all they had to do was interpret the constitutional term ‘the Legislature’ to mean ‘the people’? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
At times, the judiciary’s resistance to delving into the factual underpinnings of expert witness opinions is extraordinary. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  One reason, I think, is because many times the TM would be part of what doesn’t matter to most consumers, so the account of the consumer compressed only into her response to the TM is inherently contradictory: it is at least not empirical. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm by Mark Walsh
The subject matter is obviously less intense than that of Glossip. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm by Kevin
The sentence just before that one says this: "The right to marry is fundamental as a matter of history and tradition, but rights come not from ancient sources alone. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm by Sandy Levinson
  It was literally incredible to believe that there weren't always five votes to nationalize same-sex marriage when the Court felt it appropriate to do so. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
That case was appealed to the Supreme Court which agreed to hear the matter together with three other cases. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:11 am by Lovechilde
  According to Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kennedy's carefully reasoned opinion was result-oriented and "had nothing to do with the Constitution. [read post]