Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 5081 - 5100 of 8,961
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2013, 6:15 am by Joel R. Brandes
"Identification document" means any of the following exclusively in the name of the protected party: birth certificate, passport, social security card, health insurance or other benefits card, a card or document used to access bank, credit or other financial accounts or records, tax returns, any driver's license, and immigration documents including but not limited to a United States permanent resident card and employment authorization document. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In a significant recent development and instruction to our jurisprudence, the Supreme Court answered the question now posed to us from the perspective of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:13 am by editor
If the taxpayer is dissatisfied with the results of the CDP Hearing, then the taxpayer can seek judicial review of the IRS’s decision in the United States Tax Court. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:13 am by editor
If the taxpayer is dissatisfied with the results of the CDP Hearing, then the taxpayer can seek judicial review of the IRS’s decision in the United States Tax Court. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 12:14 pm
Seamen are entitled to the facilities of a marine hospital or other United States Public Health Service benefits for ailments incurred during the course of their employment. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
A treaty investor is a national of a country with which the United States maintains a treaty of commerce and navigation. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:16 am by Joel R. Brandes
The retention of the children in the United States breached the rights of custody of the petitioner under the law of Sweden. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
 The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:44 am by JP Sarmiento
CASE: I-130 and Consular Processing (Immigrant Visa) CLIENT: Chinese LPR Petitioner in Ohio; Chinese Beneficiary Wife and Daughter in China LOCATION: Petitioner: Ohio; Beneficiaries: China Our client retained us to bring his wife and daughter from China to the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The County Support Collection Unit shall adjust each of its child and spousal support calculations in light of the foregoing and advise the parties and Family Court of the adjusted amount of the total combined arrears; counsel for the wife shall promptly provide the Support Collection Unit with a copy of the decision. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
(Klayman at 66)This case is the latest chapter in the Judiciary's continuing challenge to balance the national interests of the United States with the individual liberties of our citizens. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:50 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 11:43 am by Tejinder Singh
Petitioner Julie Heimeshoff,the beneficiary of an ERISA disability benefits plan, became ill and had to stop working. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:50 am by Eugene Volokh
She claims to face a significant risk of persecution there because, since coming to the United States in 2002, she has given birth to two children in violation of China’s one-child policy (the official designation is “family planning policy”)…. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
Thus, the petitioner established that the child was habitually resident in Costa Rica and then removed to the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am by Joel R. Brandes
Mass) petitioner Francelly Sanchez Londono,  the mother of E.G, a minor child filed a petition against. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]