Search for: "United States v. Texas"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 8,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm
Immigration Law Case: United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:58 am
United States Customs and Border Protection, No. 22-5071, asks whether an “Officer of the United States,” rather than an employee, must issue a removal order. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:09 pm
See Choice Inc. of Texas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 3:52 pm
In Texas, they shoot them down like game birds. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:42 am
Texas being just two of many examples. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:27 am
That indeterminate status is no longer a concern to his mother, Associate United States Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:44 am
One patent lawsuit, Stryker v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
In 2010, it sued in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging unauthorized interception and broadcast of the December 2007 "Undefeated" match between Floyd Mayweather and Ricky Hatton. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am
Many states tried to weaponize the COVID-19 crisis to prohibit abortion under the guise of protecting public health, a terrifying preview of what would happen if Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
United States Trustee v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
What the Court said in Galloway v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am
It would have a hard time saying otherwise, since the government itself petitioned for Supreme Court review on this very issue a couple years back in the much-relisted United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:04 pm
United States, however, recognized an exception for cases in which a nonmember enters a contract or other consensual commercial relationship with a tribe or its members. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 6:50 am
On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued a presidential proclamation declaring a national emergency at the southern border of the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
Relying on a more traditional provision covering business conducted “directly or indirectly in the United States through any means or instrument of transportation or communication in the United States, or by persons in the United States” (as proposed by others) is not sufficient. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:15 am
That case - United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:15 am
That case - United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:15 am
That case - United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:15 am
That case - United States v. [read post]
